Creative Performance Improvements

Operational Excellence using tools like Lean and Six Sigma

Operational Excellence – The Strategic Plan (December 7, 2011)


 

What do you consider best practice when it comes to the Strategic Plan? What are some of the tools used to create it? How often is it reviewed / revised?

So far, in reviewing typical business structures from the Top Down, we have discussed the Vision Statement, the Mission Statement, and Core Values. One of the last major “strategic” elements is the Strategic Plan. In each step that we have discussed so far we have gone from the broadest, biggest, and most ethereal ideas to things that are more measureable and actionable. In my own view the Strategic Plan begins to really bring it all into focus. Although it is still far ranging (a five or ten year horizon) it’s typically the point where a business will implement metrics and timing. It is likely to also be the point where the business seriously considers the competition and what is going on around them. I once again, however, caution management teams to “define” the problem not “fix” it.

There are numerous techniques used by companies as they reach this stage of definition and direction. One of the most effective is SWOT analysis where a company defines their Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, but new tools such as Voice of the Customer and Six Sigma analysis are adding to the options that are available in collecting and analyzing data. Regardless of the technique used, the objective is to define where the company is today as well as where it needs to be in the future to keep from falling behind.  If the Strategic Plan is done well the goals will tie directly to achieving the Mission and Vision of the business. And the goals need to be SMART objectives (Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time Bound) without being overly directive. The exception to this rule may be in situations where the business is failing or in a turn around situation and rapid direct intervention is necessary to “stop the bleeding” and get the organization back on track.

An example of a SMART objective in a Strategic Plan might be: To move from the number four spot in the industry segment to the number three spot in 3 years. This sets a target for the organization without telling the staff HOW to get it done. It will require an understanding of the industry segment’s metrics in defining market position, but it ties directly back to our very first discussion around The Role of Employees in setting objectives and encouraging involvement.

I recommend that the business only have one Strategic Objective at a time. Although I have seen companies work with as many as three, unless they are prioritized, you are forcing employees to make choices concerning which one they work on. The loss of Focus can spell disaster and torpedo actual execution. I also recommend that the Strategic Objective be reviewed annually including all the data and tools used to create it. This allows for adjustments for movements in the competition and/or acceleration of unanticipated successes in the Strengths area by your team.

What is your experience with Strategic Plans?

Operational Excellence – Core Values (September 23, 2011)


Filed under: Business Culture,Core Values — Tags: , — Chuck @ 11:23 am

 

Does your organization have a set of Core Values? How do they fit into the corporate culture and ethic? They appear to be common in mission-based Non-Profits; should For-Profits adopt them?

What are Core Values? Looks like Wikipedia let me down on this one, but in my own experience Core Values define the moral and ethical character of the company. I have seen them most often in mission-based non-profits or family owned businesses in the US and they speak to the overriding values that the owners want to see used as their Mission is carried out. They have a tendency to focus internally on the employees and how they treat one another as well as the image that the employees project to the company’s external customers. 

While some employees may complain about them if they include dress codes, when properly chosen and maintained, Core Values can provide a sense of pride and teamwork as well as respect for one another. After disasters like Enron and the recent debacle on Wall Street, I wonder whether or not Core Values should be incorporated by more companies as a sort of Moral Compass. After all, even Blogs are establishing rules and standards for operation to ensure that people have a right to speak and express themselves while reminding responders that they don’t have the right to abuse others.

What do you think? Maybe we can get some of our HR staff members to chime in on this one.

Operational Excellence – The Mission Statement (July 13, 2011)


 

As we work our way through the business from the Top Down and from Strategy to Tactics and Action, I believe that the next important element of an operationally excellent business is the Mission Statement. What makes a good Mission Statement? What distinguishes a Mission Statement from the Vision?

Checking once again with Wikipedia we find Mission Statement defined as “A formal, short, written statement of the purpose of a company or organization. The mission statement should guide the actions of the organization, spell out its overall goal, provide a sense of direction, and guide decision-making.”

Sometimes you will hear the Mission statement referred to as a BHAG. The acronym BHAG (pronounced BEE Hag) or Big Harry Audacious Goal was coined by James Collins and Jerry Porras in their 1996 article entitled Building Your Company’s Vision. Collin and Porras are also authors of the widely read books Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies and Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t. In their 1996 article they said “A BHAG is clear and compelling, serves as a unifying focal point of effort, and acts as a clear catalyst for team spirit. It has a clear finish line, so the organization can know when it has achieved the goal; people like to shoot for finish lines.”

In some cases companies will borrow another acronym and practice from project management known as SMART goals to better define their BHAG. SMART, which is attributed to George T. Duran in an article written for Management Review in 1981, encourages businesses to make sure that the goal is Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time bound.

In my own experience there is a fine line between “enough” and “too much” guidance in creating a Mission Statement. While I certainly agree with the creation of a BHAG as a way of further defining a strategy for achieving the Vision, and I support the attributes of SMART goals, I caution clients to make sure that the Mission Statement stays Strategic. Ultimately the idea is to use the strength and knowledge of their staff to determine how the BHAG will be accomplished. When management begins to dictate the how by defining the BHAG too narrowly they have violated one of my personal rules for Operational Excellence; they have turned their staff members into victims instead of participants.

What are your thoughts and experience with Mission Statements?

Operational Excellence – Vision Statements and Focus (June 14, 2011)


 

How important is it for a business to have a Vision Statement? Should staff members and employees be able to reasonably recite the Vision Statement for a client or customer? How important is a Vision Statement to the employees themselves?

I believe that a Vision Statements provides Focus for employees. They act as a guiding light as employees are bombarded throughout the day with a multitude of choices and decisions to be made without the continued need for direction from management.

What is a Vision Statement? Wikipedia aptly defines a Vision Statement as “the desired or intended future state of an organization or enterprise in terms of its fundamental objective and/or strategic direction. Vision is a long term view, sometimes describing how the organization would like the world in which it operates to be. For example a charity working with the poor might have a vision statement which read ‘A world without poverty’”. So why does a business need one?

When an individual or group of individuals develop a product or service that they believe meets the needs of a group of prospective customers they usually have great clarity (Vision and Focus) concerning what it is, how it is supposed to work, and what need they are addressing. Although the originators may go through a number of iterations in the early days of their business, they know how to make or provide duplicates of the original product or service so that they can continue grow. Usually, all is well and good until the first staff person is hired who was not an original member of the development team.

Adding staff can be difficult, but with experience and a bit of luck, employees are added and the business moves forward. All too often, as employees are added, the Vision and Focus begin to get diluted and the quality of the product and/or service as well as the business can suffer. They may not suffer enough to fail but it’s likely that they will not move forward with the same clarity and passion of the originators without help.

The loss of Vision and Focus can also occur as new opportunities arise and there is a call for the original product or service to be modified or upgraded to meet new or expanded customer needs. It can also occur when there is a problem in the duplication, implementation, distribution, or use of the product or service by the customer and a rework or retrofit is required. However these changes and modifications occur; they negatively impact the original intent and purpose of the business causing it to be less efficient and less responsive than it was in the beginning. Individually these changes are often small; so small that there is little perceptible impact, but over time they build up like “dust bunnies” under a bed and eventually the business is ready for a good cleaning. But how will you know what to keep and what to toss without Vision and Focus?

Operational Excellence – The Role of Employees (June 8, 2011)


 

This post, and hopefully all those that follow, is intended to applaud and celebrate the role and the impact that “employees” can and do have in the positive transformation of the businesses that they participate in. Over the past 30+ years I have had the honor and privilege of helping a number of companies, as an employee and as a consultant, increase their productivity and/or turn themselves around through creative performance improvements, productivity tools like Lean and Six Sigma, and the implementation of Operational Excellence. In all cases, however, the real key to my success and the success of the company in making and sustaining the improvement and effecting true cultural change has been the people who are involved in the various business processes, at all levels, within the organization when given the training, direction, and opportunity to make it happen.

Having started out on the factory floor at the age of 16 and working my way through college as well as many different industries and businesses domestically and internationally, it is my belief that the majority of employees want to make a positive contribution to the businesses that they work in and be recognized for what they know and how well they perform their jobs. While I will admit that I have run across my share of deadbeats, slackers, and goof balls, I believe that the success, the growth, and the ability of businesses to not only survive but thrive, is linked directly to how well their employees are trained, motivated, led, and allowed to actively participate in their own destiny as well as that of the businesses for which they work. In short, I believe that the majority of workers want to know and feel that they are participants in their businesses; not victims of the whims and directions of some far removed management team or boss.

As I mentioned above, I have used and ardently support the use of tools like Lean and Six Sigma, and I have installed and implemented sophisticated computerized process control systems, but there is much to be said for the value of the person actually involved in the process in terms of their experience and instincts. In the end, even as powerful as they are, Lean and Six Sigma are still “tools” and they rely on the operators. Without the experience and instincts of the process operators these tools and others can be used poorly or can be a complete waste of time.

 

Going Forward 

In future posts I plan to cover and comment on other elements and structures within a business and those things that I believe are necessary to achieve Operational Excellence while taking a top-down approach. While I work away sharing my own thoughts and experiences, I hope to hear back from you as business participants and leaders concerning the topics that I tee up as well as any others that I have missed or neglected. While every business and company is unique and will have its own needs to achieving Operational Excellence, I believe that a lot can be learned and accomplished by sharing our thoughts, experiences, and knowledge.